Skip to main content

Creative (Re)Interpretation of History


So, after a lot of research, studying of maps, driving of back roads, and assorted flights of fancy, here's the concept for my version of the B&V: On the brink of bankruptcy, the B&V was rescued by an investment by the Santa Fe, which saw an opportunity to establish a "back door" into the Los Angeles area. That permitted the line to be built as originally envisioned: From the SP interchange at Fillmore, into the mountains to the Lockwood Valley, then along the Cuyama River to the San Joaquin Valley, where it connected with the Sunset Railroad, co-owned by the SP and Santa Fe. The line was also extended from Fillmore to the SP (now UP) interchange in Oxnard, connecting with the (real-world VCRy) line to Port Hueneme.

I'm not 100 percent sure exactly where the proposed line was supposed to run. Articles I've read say up Sespe Creek to Sespe Hot Springs, then north and over the ridge to Mutah Flat; beyond there I'm not sure how it was supposed to get to the Cuyama, which is some distance (20 miles or so) northwest. I'm routing my version along Lockwood Creek, which is not the easiest route, but runs past the site of the now-vanished community of Lexington, and an equally long-gone gold mill at Long Dave Canyon. From there, it would arrive at Lockwood Valley near where the North Fork of Lockwood Creek meets Lockwood Valley Road. From there it would bear west, more or less following Lockwood Valley road to Highway 33, then north along the 33 to Maricopa.

In my version, the railroad built a division point at Lockwood, where engines could be serviced and crews rested after the hard haul up into the mountains. From there, a branch, or possibly a narrow gauge line called the Lockwood & San Emigdio, runs east and slightly north to serve the large borax mines at Stauffer. In real life, these were closed down by 1910, but I'm assuming with readily available rail transportation, they would have stayed in service for some years into the 20th century. That line continues east through Cuddy Valley, where there is some agricultural traffic, then north to the lumber mill at Mil Potrero.

My current thinking is to model this in probably the 1920s. Equipment at that point is a mix of influences from both the SP and the Santa Fe. By 1960, the line becomes a Santa Fe branch, and motive power is mostly blue-and-yellow Santa Fe road switchers.

Just to add further confusion, here's another concept, the Sespe Cuyama & Sisquoc (yes, I did choose the name because most people can't pronounce any of those words). This version is a narrow gauge line that continues west from Cuyama to connect with the narrow gauge Pacific Coast Railway near Santa Maria. The Eastern Division, from Cuyama Jct. to Fillmore, is the same route as the B&V. The place names are all based on real places and the industries noted on the map are also based at least loosely on reality. The spur to the borax mines is a foreshortened version of the L&SE. In one alternate reality, the SC&S was built as shown in narrow gauge, then later converted to standard gauge, with the Western Division to Santa Maria abandoned when the SPC closed down; the surviving standard gauge line was renamed the Bakersfield & Ventura, which is both more descriptive and easier to pronounce.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Side-Tracked

The other day, as my wife and I were rearranging some furniture in the living room, she made the comment that it might be fun to put a small train display on a side table where she normally displays some potted plants. She had in mind my Lockwood & San Emigdio On30 diorama, which she's watched me work on the last several months -- but of course, the suggestion got me thinking in other directions. Since the purpose, at least in part, will be to entertain the grandkids when they come to visit, it makes sense to have a continuous lap. Since the tabletop is only about 25 by 54 inches, that limits me to a 10 or maybe 11 inch radius, a bit more if I overlap the tabletop a few inches. I'm thinking On30, so that's too tight for any of the equipment I currently own. There are some people doing wonderful work in On30 building mini- and micro-layouts with these kinds of curves and smaller, using the Bachmann 0-4-0 and 0-4-2 Porters, Davenport gas-mechanicals, and other small switc...

Side-Tracked, Continued

I was cleaning my garage the other day and pulled out a 30x60 inch layout I started some years back in HOn30, but abandoned pretty quickly. The trains were just too small for me, and there wasn't a lot of equipment available -- there's no equivalent of Bachmann's relatively cheap and plentiful ready-to-run On30 cars and locomotives, and only a few kits. I'm kind of taking this as a sign from the fates. The overall size of the old, partly built layout is in the upper range of what I was thinking about doing in On30. The curve of N scale track at the left end in the photo is 12 inch radius, and the right end is 13 inches, both in the range of what I was considering. The rest of the track plan doesn't translate so well -- the plan drawn on the board has a passing siding on the front side that would have been short in HOn30 and would have been all but useless in On30. The upper level branchline track has a 9 inch curve, which is probably too tight for anything but an 0-...

The Palo Verde & Pacific

I came across a few old slides of my former layout (late '80s-early '90s), the Palo Verde & Pacific. Here a a few shots for the historical record. The locomotive is a first-run Atlas/Kato RSD 4/5. The signal you see in two of the photos is a scratchbuilt LED signal actuated by a homemade Twin-T detector.