Skip to main content

Creative (Re)Interpretation of History


So, after a lot of research, studying of maps, driving of back roads, and assorted flights of fancy, here's the concept for my version of the B&V: On the brink of bankruptcy, the B&V was rescued by an investment by the Santa Fe, which saw an opportunity to establish a "back door" into the Los Angeles area. That permitted the line to be built as originally envisioned: From the SP interchange at Fillmore, into the mountains to the Lockwood Valley, then along the Cuyama River to the San Joaquin Valley, where it connected with the Sunset Railroad, co-owned by the SP and Santa Fe. The line was also extended from Fillmore to the SP (now UP) interchange in Oxnard, connecting with the (real-world VCRy) line to Port Hueneme.

I'm not 100 percent sure exactly where the proposed line was supposed to run. Articles I've read say up Sespe Creek to Sespe Hot Springs, then north and over the ridge to Mutah Flat; beyond there I'm not sure how it was supposed to get to the Cuyama, which is some distance (20 miles or so) northwest. I'm routing my version along Lockwood Creek, which is not the easiest route, but runs past the site of the now-vanished community of Lexington, and an equally long-gone gold mill at Long Dave Canyon. From there, it would arrive at Lockwood Valley near where the North Fork of Lockwood Creek meets Lockwood Valley Road. From there it would bear west, more or less following Lockwood Valley road to Highway 33, then north along the 33 to Maricopa.

In my version, the railroad built a division point at Lockwood, where engines could be serviced and crews rested after the hard haul up into the mountains. From there, a branch, or possibly a narrow gauge line called the Lockwood & San Emigdio, runs east and slightly north to serve the large borax mines at Stauffer. In real life, these were closed down by 1910, but I'm assuming with readily available rail transportation, they would have stayed in service for some years into the 20th century. That line continues east through Cuddy Valley, where there is some agricultural traffic, then north to the lumber mill at Mil Potrero.

My current thinking is to model this in probably the 1920s. Equipment at that point is a mix of influences from both the SP and the Santa Fe. By 1960, the line becomes a Santa Fe branch, and motive power is mostly blue-and-yellow Santa Fe road switchers.

Just to add further confusion, here's another concept, the Sespe Cuyama & Sisquoc (yes, I did choose the name because most people can't pronounce any of those words). This version is a narrow gauge line that continues west from Cuyama to connect with the narrow gauge Pacific Coast Railway near Santa Maria. The Eastern Division, from Cuyama Jct. to Fillmore, is the same route as the B&V. The place names are all based on real places and the industries noted on the map are also based at least loosely on reality. The spur to the borax mines is a foreshortened version of the L&SE. In one alternate reality, the SC&S was built as shown in narrow gauge, then later converted to standard gauge, with the Western Division to Santa Maria abandoned when the SPC closed down; the surviving standard gauge line was renamed the Bakersfield & Ventura, which is both more descriptive and easier to pronounce.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Track Planning for the B&V

Designing a model railroad layout is always a tradeoff between many factors -- ratio of track to scenery, switching vs. mainline running, point-to-point or continuous running -- but most of all, what will fit in the available space. As I think about starting a new B&V, I've been contemplating what appeals to me, personally. I've designed and built a dozen or so layouts of all sizes and configurations, and helped design, built, and operate on club layouts and friends' layouts, so I have a pretty good sense of what I like. That doesn't mean that what I like is "right" or "better" than someone else's preference. You do you, I do me. Not what an article in a model railroad magazine, much less a Facebook post, says is the best way to do things. That said, when I am operating my own layout, I like seeing trains run through reasonably realistic scenery BUT I don't find it satisfying watching them go around in circles (again, I'm not judging ...

The Journey Resumes

Over the weekend, I started building a 16” x 64” diorama.  I’ve been pretty inactive in the hobby for about 15 years. Now that I’m nearing retirement I’m thinking about building another small-to-medium layout (4 x 8 island to as large as a 9 x 15 U-shape). At this point, I’m debating whether to stay with HO (I have a lifetime accumulation of HO equipment) or switch to On30 (I really like the heft and detail, and I’m a sucker for old-time narrow gauge trains). The diorama is meant as a warm-up for that.    I wanted to get a feel for building track and one or two structures in O scale, and try out some new construction techniques, like foam construction and Sculptamold instead of plaster. I plan to hand lay the track, to see if my eyesight and patience as still up to it. The finished product will provide a place to display some of my On30 equipment and do a little photography. It will mostly live on a shelf in my garage/train room, but will be lightweight enough to move out...

Side-Tracked

The other day, as my wife and I were rearranging some furniture in the living room, she made the comment that it might be fun to put a small train display on a side table where she normally displays some potted plants. She had in mind my Lockwood & San Emigdio On30 diorama, which she's watched me work on the last several months -- but of course, the suggestion got me thinking in other directions. Since the purpose, at least in part, will be to entertain the grandkids when they come to visit, it makes sense to have a continuous lap. Since the tabletop is only about 25 by 54 inches, that limits me to a 10 or maybe 11 inch radius, a bit more if I overlap the tabletop a few inches. I'm thinking On30, so that's too tight for any of the equipment I currently own. There are some people doing wonderful work in On30 building mini- and micro-layouts with these kinds of curves and smaller, using the Bachmann 0-4-0 and 0-4-2 Porters, Davenport gas-mechanicals, and other small switc...