Skip to main content

Side-Tracked

The other day, as my wife and I were rearranging some furniture in the living room, she made the comment that it might be fun to put a small train display on a side table where she normally displays some potted plants. She had in mind my Lockwood & San Emigdio On30 diorama, which she's watched me work on the last several months -- but of course, the suggestion got me thinking in other directions.

Since the purpose, at least in part, will be to entertain the grandkids when they come to visit, it makes sense to have a continuous lap. Since the tabletop is only about 25 by 54 inches, that limits me to a 10 or maybe 11 inch radius, a bit more if I overlap the tabletop a few inches. I'm thinking On30, so that's too tight for any of the equipment I currently own.

There are some people doing wonderful work in On30 building mini- and micro-layouts with these kinds of curves and smaller, using the Bachmann 0-4-0 and 0-4-2 Porters, Davenport gas-mechanicals, and other small switchers, with shorty cars. This is mostly caricature modelling, reminiscent of Big Thunder Mountain at the Disney theme parks -- some of the pioneers of this style, like John Olsen, were Disney employees. But it's a lot of fun.

So now I'm thinking about building a mini-layout in On30. The layout itself won't cost that much (probably) but if I go down this road, I'm going to have to pick up one of the little Bachmann engines and at least a few cars. Darn it all!

Here are a couple of track plans. The first, a true 2 x 4 footer, is the current leading contender. Mountain at left; the blue is a creek, giving me an excuse to build a low trestle. Grey squares are buildings. If I built this, I'd probably repurpose the ore bin and cabin from the diorama, then convert the diorama to an H.O. display.

There's a still a chance I might stretch this a bit, to 54 inches, which would exactly match the size of the table my wife has offered. Here's a version of that:


I did also play around with some larger designs, up to 28x64 inches. It's pushing the limits of what I can get away with in the living room, but would allow for a lot more operation -- maybe even two trains. This would be more of a medium-term project, probably not something that would be done by Christmas (others may work faster, but I have a pretty good sense of my own pace of work and the amount of time I have available in the next three months).

Another variation, 28 x 56, with a passing siding on the curve. The inner track is 10 inch radius, outer track is 12 inch. A concern here is track spacing on the curved passing track. Most of it is 3 inches, but that may not be enough.

Addendum: Welp, I pulled the trigger on an 0-4-2, so I guess I'm doing this. At the moment I'm leaning toward the 2x4 plan, figuring I can get the track, basic scenery, and a couple of buildings done for the holidays, then move on to building the H.O. shelf layout after the first of the year. I was toying with the idea of hand-laying the track, but I just also ordered a couple of Peco small-radius switches (I'll need at least one more, maybe two or three) so I'm pretty much committed to going the flex track route. The good news is it will only take me a couple of days to get at least the basic loop in place and be able to start running trains.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Track Planning for the B&V

Designing a model railroad layout is always a tradeoff between many factors -- ratio of track to scenery, switching vs. mainline running, point-to-point or continuous running -- but most of all, what will fit in the available space. As I think about starting a new B&V, I've been contemplating what appeals to me, personally. I've designed and built a dozen or so layouts of all sizes and configurations, and helped design, built, and operate on club layouts and friends' layouts, so I have a pretty good sense of what I like. That doesn't mean that what I like is "right" or "better" than someone else's preference. You do you, I do me. Not what an article in a model railroad magazine, much less a Facebook post, says is the best way to do things. That said, when I am operating my own layout, I like seeing trains run through reasonably realistic scenery BUT I don't find it satisfying watching them go around in circles (again, I'm not judging ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Did We Get Here?

I'm in the early stages (February 2022) of my second effort to model the Bakersfield & Ventura Railroad, as it might have been if history had been a little different ... or maybe as it is in some other parallel universe. There's more information on the real-world B&V in my other Bakersfield & Ventura blog  https://bakersfieldandventura.blogspot.com/  so I won't go into too much detail here, but in brief: The B&V was a proposed southern California railroad line that would have run from ... wait for it ... Fillmore to Maricopa. To be fair, Fillmore is not far from Ventura, and Maricopa is not too far from Bakersfield. The line would mostly have carried agricultural and petroleum-related freight between the southern San Joaquin Valley and the harbor at Port Hueneme, giving farmers and businesspeople a more direct and less expensive way to get their products to market.  In 1907, the company bought a small streetcar line in Oxnard, extended it to serve a couple...
Post a Comment
Read more

Engines (and inspirations)

Engine #58 is one of two Consolidations on the road and is the mainstay of operations (its twin is still in the box but will be put into service once I get a new layout built). These are Bachmann engines with the original tender replaced by a Bachmann SP-style Vanderbilt oil tender. The only other modification was to shave off the "smoke deflector," or whatever it's supposed to be, on the back on the cab roof. They're fitted with TCS DCC modules. This unit has obviously been lettered for the Bakersfield & Ventura and given some weathering. SD&AE #104 My B&V Consolidations were inspired by San Diego & Arizona Eastern #104 and her sister engines. I believe 104 was purchased second-hand from the SP, but SD&AE had a couple of nearly identical engines that they bought new. #104 was probably the first steam engine I ever saw up close. It was on display for many years at the San Diego County Fairgrounds. It's now at the Pacific Southwest Railroad Muse...
Post a Comment
Read more